Log in
A A A
Mums’ anger at porn Plan PDF Print E-mail
News - World News
Written by GRAEME WILSON, Deputy Political Editor | Thesun.co.uk   
Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:16

FURIOUS mums have slammed Liberal Democrat plans to let 16-year-olds watch and star in PORN films.
The controversial policy has faced blistering criticism in the chatrooms of Mumsnet, a popular website for mothers.

Under the Lib Dems, the legal age for viewing or appearing in adult movies will be cut from 18 to 16.

But the policy - overwhelmingly passed at the party's conference in 2004 - has now been savaged on the internet by women who claim it is "essentially legalisation of child porn".

One mum, called crystal123, fumed: "Many young people aged 12 appear 16 or 17 and could easily end up in explicit pornography.

"Young people need protecting from perverts."

While Clairewilliams1973 added: "Teens need special protection under the law that lets them experiment with life... but protects them from people who may exploit them.

"I simply cannot vote for a party that advocates this."

She added that when her husband phoned their local Lib Dem office to complain, he was told: "If you don't like it, you don't have to vote for us."

A poster called growell added: "Sorry, but scum of the earth."

Parenting websites like MumsNet and NetMums are seen as vital election battlegrounds.

The Lib Dems confirmed last night that the party's policy was to let 16-year-olds watch and star in porn movies.

But a spokesman added: "Our manifesto sets out what we will do in government. This policy is not in our manifesto."

Source: http://www.thesun.co.uk/

Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!
bignick88   |138.217.249.xxx |2010-04-28 07:57:27
i think they are right the legal age for people ap pearing in adult films and pu
blications should be 18 and that the industry needs to establish an int ernatio
nal standard for movies to verify age of pa rticipants instead of jurisdictional
nightmares be tween countries
DALEK  - Thats FUNNY   |112.141.213.xxx |2010-04-30 09:19:34
because it USED to be 18+ in the UK but when they came under the EU umbrella it
was LOWERED to 16 to perform or model nude/pornographically.

Then EU upped i
t to 18, so UK followed suit.

It WAS the s ame here, 16 to model, 18 to view. P
retty stupid r eally. All the same age it should be, 16 to model/ view or 18 to
model/view, not 1 and another!

If y a OLD enuff to DO it...
tyciol   |174.115.134.xxx |2010-05-05 23:48:29
This is a great idea! I'm not sure about what spec ific age is right for porn, b
ut I think it should be identical to whatever age is deemed right for s ex. It
will avoid ridiculous things like couples w ho can legally copulate but not send
clips of it t o each other for private review, not to mention a greater freedo
m for employment.

All this stuff ab out '12 year olds who look 16' seems silly
to me, you could just as easily say '14 year olds who loo k 18'.

...

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 

If you have a website and would like to put our banner on it, it's easy to do.
Check out our range of banners here, then save one to your desktop, load it onto your website and link it to
http://www.sexparty.org.au

online-registration
Technogenics

RTA - Restricted to adults



Authorised by Robert Swan, 10 Ipswich Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609.

Australian Sex Party